The question who owns (or does not own) land in South Africa has reached proportions that are silly. On one hand we have the galaxy's only living brain donor convincing the uneducated masses that the whites are 'settlers' and have 'stolen' the land. (At the same time being quiet that the said uneducated masses are also 'settlers') Our brain donor (I believe) is directly behind the farm killings and the genocide against black foreigners. But I digress.
I don't own land. Why? Because I can't afford to buy it. That was easy wasn't it? We do live in a monetary system. But no. The uneducated masses, dispute all education, rejects this.
Not that long ago when Jan arrived he found that the uneducated masses would move from place to place with their livestock. If there was no food, they would move on. The typical male would sit in front of his hut and drink beer, while the woman would do all the work. After Jan purchased livestock from the community for example, imagine his horror when the community come back and stole the livestock a few days later.
Clearly this is an on-going problem.
One would have thought that after almost four hundred years that they would have grasped the concept of 'money' and 'ownership.'
So what would the solution be?
Being a black man is a nice place to be. You get to pick and chose what you want in your 'culture.' You can claim that your being oppressed and get free land (that is taken from someone else.) You can move into the home, which quickly crumbles (upkeep? What's that?)
We can't turn the clock back. We can't undo what we've done.
To paint the picture differently. Let's say (for the sake of discussion) that no-one entered Africa at all. No Arabs, no whites etc. The obvious question would be 'where would the local population be on the scale of things?' Would they be in the stone age? Or do you think they would be putting people on the moon?
Ever heard of the cargo cult? The natives of the island of Tanna in Vanuatu were in the stone age when solders from the USA landed to fight against the Japanese. John Frum is their 'god.'
...followers of John Frum built symbolic landing strips to encourage American aeroplanes to once again land and bring them 'cargo'. Versions of the cult that emphasize the American influence interpret 'John Frum' as a corruption of 'John from (America)' (although it could be John from anywhere), and credit the presence of black Americans as influencing the idea that John Frum could be black. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Frum)
I wonder if the same would happen in the picture we have painted? Would the uneducated masses still be in the stone-age? Or would they have wiped each other out? Shaka was responsible for about 2 million people (the great scattering.)
But please. Let's have history speak:
“We are are members of a “Volk” that is attacked and despised by you today. You attacked our rights and our dignity. We are the people who gave up all our belongings in a search of a country of our own where we can govern ourselves, just like you want to govern yourselves. You refer to us ‘leaving the Cape Colony’ as if we wanted to withdraw ourselves from civilization. You accuse us that we ‘do not act as missionaries and force Christianity on a people who do not wishes it upon themselves.’ You ask, “Did the Almighty tell our Commandant general to stand up and take ownership of the land?” Our answer is that the largest area of the current British Colony, Natal and the Free State were legally bought by by the Dutch immigrants from the former legal “Kaffir tribes” who lived on it. A section was taken over by legally fought wars, wars that were caused by the Natives. When the Dutch Immigrants found themselves in 1836 landless between the Vet and Vaal River, they bought the land from the natives. While peace were established with the “Kaffir tribes” surrounding them, Mozilikatze and the Zulus or Matabeles attacked us without warning killing defenceless women and children on land we already bought from them and stole everything they could find. When Chief Commandant Potgieter arrived back from his trip to Delagoa Bay and saw the murdered families he did what you and I and every other person would have done, he annihilated the enemy. Under Piet Retief a large section of Natal was bought from the Zulu King, Dingane, who without warning killed 70 men. They then proceeded to kill (at Bloukrans) every white man, woman and child they could find. Under a small group of Kommandant General Pretorius the Zulus were defeated (At Blood River). In 1845 a large section of land in the area of Ohrigstad was bought from the natives and in 1846 they bought another section of land from the “Kaffir King” “Omswaas”. In 1854 another section of land between the Buffels and Pongola Rivers now Utrecht, was bought from the Panda and a year later they bought another section of land from Omswaas north of the Pongola River. And with this, the question of how we, the “Despicable Dutchmen”, took ownership of our land is answered”. (The letter was first published on Tuesday, 3rd of April 1860 in “De Oude Emigrant” Potchefstroom.
The ANC wants to steal the land. That is their goal.
No comments:
Post a Comment